Review



early growth response protein 1  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology early growth response protein 1
    Early Growth Response Protein 1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 58 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+siRNA/pmc13019754-30-32-41
    Average 93 stars, based on 58 article reviews
    early growth response protein 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Staining:

    Article Title: Inhibition of CBP/β-catenin signaling ameliorated fibrosis in cholestatic liver disease.
    Article Snippet: .. In addition, the samples were immunohistochemically stained using antibodies against S100A4, GS, cytokeratin 19 (Abcam), Egr- 1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), F4/80 (Invitrogen), CBP (Cell Signaling Technology), P300 (GeneTex), and Ki- 67 (DAKO) using the VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit or the M.O.M Immunodetection Kit (Vector Lab). .. For human liver- tissue staining, antibodies against CBP (Cell Signaling Technology), P300 (GeneTex), and Egr- 1 (Cell Signaling Technology) were used.

    Article Title: Roles of c-Fos, EGR-1, PKA, and PKC in cognitive dysfunction in rats after propofol anesthesia
    Article Snippet: .. For hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining, the slices were incubated with a solution containing rabbit antibodies for EGR-1, c-Fos, PKA, and PKC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Biotechnology, CA, USA 1:1000) at 37 °C for four hours and then stored at 4 °C overnight. ..

    Immunodetection:

    Article Title: Inhibition of CBP/β-catenin signaling ameliorated fibrosis in cholestatic liver disease.
    Article Snippet: .. In addition, the samples were immunohistochemically stained using antibodies against S100A4, GS, cytokeratin 19 (Abcam), Egr- 1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), F4/80 (Invitrogen), CBP (Cell Signaling Technology), P300 (GeneTex), and Ki- 67 (DAKO) using the VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit or the M.O.M Immunodetection Kit (Vector Lab). .. For human liver- tissue staining, antibodies against CBP (Cell Signaling Technology), P300 (GeneTex), and Egr- 1 (Cell Signaling Technology) were used.

    Immunohistochemical staining:

    Article Title: Roles of c-Fos, EGR-1, PKA, and PKC in cognitive dysfunction in rats after propofol anesthesia
    Article Snippet: .. For hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining, the slices were incubated with a solution containing rabbit antibodies for EGR-1, c-Fos, PKA, and PKC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Biotechnology, CA, USA 1:1000) at 37 °C for four hours and then stored at 4 °C overnight. ..

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Roles of c-Fos, EGR-1, PKA, and PKC in cognitive dysfunction in rats after propofol anesthesia
    Article Snippet: .. For hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining, the slices were incubated with a solution containing rabbit antibodies for EGR-1, c-Fos, PKA, and PKC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Biotechnology, CA, USA 1:1000) at 37 °C for four hours and then stored at 4 °C overnight. ..



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress hy 163731
    Hy 163731, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/EGR-1-IN-1/pmc13103307-375-12-13
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hy 163731 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress egr1 inhibitor
    a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 <t>(EGR1)</t> in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).
    Egr1 Inhibitor, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/EGR-1-IN-1/pmc13103307-375-6-13
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    egr1 inhibitor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology early growth response protein 1
    a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 <t>(EGR1)</t> in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).
    Early Growth Response Protein 1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+siRNA/pmc13019754-30-32-41
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    early growth response protein 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti egr1
    a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 <t>(EGR1)</t> in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).
    Mouse Anti Egr1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+Antibody/pmc12920653-202-23-29
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti egr1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti arc
    a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 <t>(EGR1)</t> in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).
    Mouse Anti Arc, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+Antibody/pmc12852826-139-16-18
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti arc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti zif268 egr1
    a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 <t>(EGR1)</t> in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).
    Mouse Anti Zif268 Egr1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+Antibody/pmc12852826-139-9-12
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti zif268 egr1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology co ip assays
    A – C Immunofluorescence (IF) colocalization analysis <t>of</t> <t>EGR1</t> and Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery factors, including UBF ( A ), RRN3 ( B ) and RPA40 ( C ); IF assays were performed with HeLa cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. D – F Analysis of immunofluorescence colocalization between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery, including UBF ( D ), RRN3 ( E ) and RPA40 ( F ); IF assays were performed with HepG2 cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. G – I Representative images showing coimmunoprecipitation between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HeLa <t>cells.</t> <t>Co-IP</t> assays were performed using HeLa nuclear extract and an anti-EGR1 antibody, and proteins precipitated by the EGR1 antibody were detected by Western blot using antibodies against the indicated factors ( G ). The results of reciprocal co-IP assays are presented in ( H and I ). J – L Representative images showing the coimmunoprecipitation of EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HepG2 cells. Co-IP assays were performed as described in ( G – I ). The input in ( G – L ) is equivalent to 2.5% of the samples used for each IP assay.
    Co Ip Assays, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+Antibody/pmc12894684-434-0-9
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    co ip assays - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti egr1 antibody
    A – C Immunofluorescence (IF) colocalization analysis <t>of</t> <t>EGR1</t> and Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery factors, including UBF ( A ), RRN3 ( B ) and RPA40 ( C ); IF assays were performed with HeLa cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. D – F Analysis of immunofluorescence colocalization between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery, including UBF ( D ), RRN3 ( E ) and RPA40 ( F ); IF assays were performed with HepG2 cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. G – I Representative images showing coimmunoprecipitation between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HeLa <t>cells.</t> <t>Co-IP</t> assays were performed using HeLa nuclear extract and an anti-EGR1 antibody, and proteins precipitated by the EGR1 antibody were detected by Western blot using antibodies against the indicated factors ( G ). The results of reciprocal co-IP assays are presented in ( H and I ). J – L Representative images showing the coimmunoprecipitation of EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HepG2 cells. Co-IP assays were performed as described in ( G – I ). The input in ( G – L ) is equivalent to 2.5% of the samples used for each IP assay.
    Anti Egr1 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/egr+1/Egr-1+Antibody/pm41507426-305-6-9
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti egr1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 (EGR1) in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: DPEP2 suppresses hyperinflammation via metabolic reprogramming of macrophages in sepsis

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70466-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a ChIP-Seq profiles from ENCODE database identified a potential binding site for early growth response 1 (EGR1) in DPEP2 promoter region. b EGR1 is an inflammation-inducible transcriptional repressor responsible for suppressing DPEP2 expression in macrophages during sepsis. This image was created in BioRender. Qiu, Z. (2026) https://biorender.com/t7mfnvo . c Levels of Egr1 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). d The expression of Dpep2 of RAW264.7 cells pre-treated with an inhibitor targeting EGR1 for 0 or 1 h, followed by LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h, were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). e Levels of Dpep2 were determined after LPS stimulation for 0 or 12 h in RAW264.7 cells with Egr1 deficiency (sh Egr1 ) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT) ( n = 3 biological replicates). f Cysteine leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathways. g – j Levels of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) secreted by RAW264.7 cells with Dpep2 deficiency (sh Dpep2 RAW264.7 cells) vs control RAW264.7 cells (shNT RAW264.7 cells) ( g , h ), and RAW264.7 cells overexpressing Dpep2 (DPEP2) vs control vector (Vector) cells ( i , j ) ( n = 3 biological replicates). k RAW264.7 cells were treated with 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTD4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + 1 μM LTE4, or 1 μg/mL LPS + DMSO for 12 h. Then, levels of Il1b , Il6, and Tnf were determined ( n = 3 biological replicates). l Flag-tagged WT DPEP2 plasmid and the enzymatic mutant targeting E190 (E190Q) were constructed. m RAW264.7 cells overexpressing WT DPEP2 (WT), enzymatic mutant DPEP2 and relatively control (Vector) were constructed. Protein levels of Flag in these cells were examined ( n = 3 or 6 biological replicates). n, o ELISA was used to measure LTD4 and LTE4 levels secreted by Vector, WT, and E190Q cells ( n = 3 biological replicates). p–r Il1b , Il6, and Tnf levels in Vector, WT, and E190Q cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR after 12h of LPS stimulation (n=3 biological replicates). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation. ns, not significant. Two-sided unpaired Student’s t test was used in ( c ), one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons was used in ( d, e, k, m–r ) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used in ( g–j ).

    Article Snippet: RAW264.7 cells were treated with a EGR1 inhibitor (5 μM EGR-1-IN-1 (IT25); HY-163731, MedChemExpress), CysLTR1 inhibitor (5 μM Zafrilukast; HY-17492, MedChemExpress), CysLTR2 inhibitor (1 μM HAMI3379; HY-112248A MedChemExpress), NF-κB inhibitor (30 μM JSH-23; HY-13982, MedChemExpress), ERK inhibitor (1 μM U0126; HY-12031A, MedChemExpress), JNK inhibitor (25 μM SP600125; HY-12041, MedChemExpress), p38 MAPK inhibitor (30 μM SB203580; HY-10256, MedChemExpress), or AKT inhibitor (30 μM Ly294002; HY-10108, MedChemExpress), for 1 h and stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 12 h.

    Techniques: ChIP-sequencing, Binding Assay, Expressing, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Mutagenesis, Construct, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Standard Deviation

    A – C Immunofluorescence (IF) colocalization analysis of EGR1 and Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery factors, including UBF ( A ), RRN3 ( B ) and RPA40 ( C ); IF assays were performed with HeLa cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. D – F Analysis of immunofluorescence colocalization between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery, including UBF ( D ), RRN3 ( E ) and RPA40 ( F ); IF assays were performed with HepG2 cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. G – I Representative images showing coimmunoprecipitation between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HeLa cells. Co-IP assays were performed using HeLa nuclear extract and an anti-EGR1 antibody, and proteins precipitated by the EGR1 antibody were detected by Western blot using antibodies against the indicated factors ( G ). The results of reciprocal co-IP assays are presented in ( H and I ). J – L Representative images showing the coimmunoprecipitation of EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HepG2 cells. Co-IP assays were performed as described in ( G – I ). The input in ( G – L ) is equivalent to 2.5% of the samples used for each IP assay.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Early growth response 1 promotes RNA polymerase I-directed transcription and cancer growth by activating RRN3 expression

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-09485-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A – C Immunofluorescence (IF) colocalization analysis of EGR1 and Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery factors, including UBF ( A ), RRN3 ( B ) and RPA40 ( C ); IF assays were performed with HeLa cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. D – F Analysis of immunofluorescence colocalization between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery, including UBF ( D ), RRN3 ( E ) and RPA40 ( F ); IF assays were performed with HepG2 cells. Scale bars in the images represent 5 μm. G – I Representative images showing coimmunoprecipitation between EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HeLa cells. Co-IP assays were performed using HeLa nuclear extract and an anti-EGR1 antibody, and proteins precipitated by the EGR1 antibody were detected by Western blot using antibodies against the indicated factors ( G ). The results of reciprocal co-IP assays are presented in ( H and I ). J – L Representative images showing the coimmunoprecipitation of EGR1 and components of the Pol Ⅰ transcription machinery in HepG2 cells. Co-IP assays were performed as described in ( G – I ). The input in ( G – L ) is equivalent to 2.5% of the samples used for each IP assay.

    Article Snippet: Co-IP assays were performed using an anti-EGR1 antibody (SC-515830; Santa Cruz Biotech).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Western Blot